[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: AT_CHECK within for loop

From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: AT_CHECK within for loop
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 10:52:06 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:37:26PM CET:
> * Joel E. Denny wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:31:05PM CET:
> > error: AT_CHECK: missing AT_SETUP detected
> Ah, I think it doesn't work to expand AT_CHECK inside a function.

Wrong again: I think it currently doesn't work to use AT_CHECK outside

Sorry for the noise.  The rest should still hold.

> Sorry for overlooking that requirement of yours.
> It might be possible to rework _AT_CHECK so that it will work in
> such a setup, should mostly be a matter of assigning some values
> that are currently held in m4 macros only to shell variables in
> AT_SETUP, and then referencing them in _AT_CHECK.  This would
> probably enlarge testsuite code a bit, but maybe negligible.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]