[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rm -f core cause some troubles
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: rm -f core cause some troubles |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Dec 2012 09:27:36 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 12/08/2012 02:52 AM, address@hidden wrote:
> So the logic when removing core files,
> would be to check first thta they are real file and not a directory.
That would slow down 'configure' everywhere.
It might make sense to have an Autoconf option that would
add that behavior as an option, for people who want to have
directories named 'core', and who don't mind the slowdown.
> ERROR: files left in build directory after distclean:
> ./confdefs.h
I don't see how this is related to the problem with 'core'.
It appears to be a separate bug.
For your immediate problem, the simplest thing might be
for you to rename the directory 'core', to 'Core', say.
If that's not possible, you could run 'configure' in
a subdirectory perhaps.
- rm -f core cause some troubles, picca, 2012/12/08
- Re: rm -f core cause some troubles,
Paul Eggert <=
- RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/08
- RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, PICCA Frédéric-Emmanuel, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Marko Lindqvist, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Eric Blake, 2012/12/10
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/15