[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles

From: Paul Eggert
Subject: Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 09:49:38 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 12/16/2012 07:06 AM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Why not just use ulimit to not dump core?  Or is that a bashism and not a shism?

The ulimit approach seems useful.

Yes, that would be nice to add, if someone writes
a patch.  I doubt whether it'd work everywhere, though.
Instead they write a core file with some other file name

Autoconf-generated 'configure' scripts remove the commonly-used
file names for core files.

or even write all core files to some other directory on the system.

It doesn't catch those.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]