[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2"
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2" |
Date: |
Wed, 8 May 2013 11:45:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday 08 May 2013 01:01:06 Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 08:49 PM, Anatol Pomozov wrote:
> > recent versions of glibc produces a
> > warning when it compiles apps with _FORTIFY_SOURCE but without -O2
>
> That's a real problem, which will break lots of things.
i complained when the change was made, but other devs feel it's the right
thing to do
Gentoo has patched it out too, although you can easily tweak the behavior in
gcc to work with either behavior (which is what at least Gentoo & Ubuntu do
rather than manually putting _FORTIFY_SOURCE into CPPFLAGS).
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", (continued)
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Ralf Corsepius, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Anatol Pomozov, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Paul Eggert, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Allan McRae, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Eric Blake, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Allan McRae, 2013/05/09
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Paul Eggert, 2013/05/08
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Zack Weinberg, 2013/05/09
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Paul Eggert, 2013/05/09
- Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2", Mike Frysinger, 2013/05/09
Re: Autoconf does not like "-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2",
Mike Frysinger <=