[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the right way to put `dnl' in the body of AT_CONFIGURE_AC tex
|
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: What's the right way to put `dnl' in the body of AT_CONFIGURE_AC text? |
|
Date: |
Fri, 20 Mar 2020 10:26:04 -0400 |
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 1:11 PM Zack Weinberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to write a test case and autom4te doesn't like it ...
>
> AT_CONFIGURE_AC([[
> m4_define([fn_bar],[fn_quux])
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([fn_foo dnl
> fn_bar dnl Ordinary comment
> fn_blurf dnl Apos'trophed comment
> ])
> ]])
It turns out that writing `dn@&t@l` instead of `dnl` *does* work for
this. I don't know why I thought it didn't. Never mind.
zw