[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Future plans for Autotools
From: |
Andy Tai |
Subject: |
Re: Future plans for Autotools |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 11:01:22 -0800 |
GNU Make integrates with guile. Maybe such extension can be done
using guile for flexibility?
(ref:
https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Guile-Integration.html#Guile-Integration)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 12:11 PM Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu> wrote:
>
> One possible way forward is to have an Autoconf 2 that builds atop GNU
> Make, both as a partial replacement for Automake (which is what Emacs
> does already), and as a way to speed up and simplify configuration. If
> 'configure' were mostly a front end to a GNU Make invocation, it could
> run configuration probes in parallel which would certainly be a win for
> me. And perhaps configuration probes could be written in GNU Make rather
> than m4, which would also be a win because it'd be one less language to
> learn. (Of course we could continue to support existing m4-based
> probes, run sequentially, as well as letting Automake do its thing for
> people who prefer Automake.)
>
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, (continued)
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Tom Tromey, 2021/01/21
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, John Calcote, 2021/01/21
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Tom Tromey, 2021/01/24
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Paul Smith, 2021/01/25
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Zack Weinberg, 2021/01/25
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Paul Smith, 2021/01/25
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Nick Bowler, 2021/01/25
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, John Calcote, 2021/01/25
- Re: Future plans for Autotools, Paul Smith, 2021/01/25