[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C23 support in Autoconf
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
Subject: |
Re: C23 support in Autoconf |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Apr 2024 14:49:24 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-416-g2c1796742e-fm-20240424.001-g2c179674 |
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024, at 2:43 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2024-04-30 11:24, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> the biggest source of problems was not function prototypes,
>> but the change of "true" and "false" to no longer be acceptable lvalues,
>> and of "bool" to be a builtin type.
>
> Thanks for mentioning that, as I hadn't run into that problem. I
> installed the attached.
Because of this class of problems, I think we ought to prioritize giving
package authors a way to control which edition of the C standard AC_PROG_CC
will select, rather than just always using the most recent one we know about.
zw
- C23 support in Autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Alan Coopersmith, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf,
Zack Weinberg <=
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Zack Weinberg, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Paul Eggert, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Alan Coopersmith, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Antonin Décimo, 2024/04/30
- Re: C23 support in Autoconf, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2024/04/30