|
From: | Akim Demaille |
Subject: | Re: Do not create conditional installation directories |
Date: | Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:35:20 +0100 |
Le 19 mars 09 à 15:01, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:The classic use case are packages which use a directory but not put any files into it.* Akim Demaille wrote on Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 06:31:50PM CET:> But the question remains: how do you think we should address the bug > that bothers Akim, other than by this patch and a big warning in NEWS?"RW" == Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden> writes:My focus was more about an empty $(foodir), not an empty $ (foo_DATA).Can you describe situations where an empty $(foodir) happens?
The confusion is that I am referring to the emptiness of the directory name (what I named an empty $(foodir)), while you are referring to an empty directory (what I named an empty $(foo_DATA)).
I'm talking about AC_SUBST([foodir], [])
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |