Re: [PATCH] {yacc-work} tests: more coverage on yacc/lex silent-rules, plus minor cleanups

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 06:38:29PM CET:
> I've (basically) addressed all your nits, and pushed to yacc-work.

Thanks!

> Just one nit on my part ...
> 
> > > +# Check that the expected non-generic rules has been truly generated.
> > 
> > truly have been generated.
> > 
> > > +# Otherwise, the coverage offered by this test will be weaker then
> > > +# expected and planned.
> > 
> > s/and planned// ?
> > 
> Hadn't we agreed to use a short sentence here?  You suggested:
>   # Ensure per-target rules are used, to ensure their coverage below.
> and I went with that.

Ah, ok, sorry about that.