[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: explicitly state that our lexers do not require unist
Re: [PATCH] tests: explicitly state that our lexers do not require unistd.h
Tue, 06 Mar 2012 09:55:57 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-06 09:03:
> On 03/06/2012 08:45 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Peter Rosin skrev 2012-03-06 08:38:
>>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-05 21:05:
>>>> I'd like to see a little addition squashed-in if you can: a new
>>>> entry in 'tests/README' explaining that a "#define YY_NO_UNISTD_H"
>>>> is needed in lex input files, and why it is so.
>>> Like this?
>> No, that wasn't quite right, but perhaps like this?
> Almost. Minor nits below.
Pushed with those nits, and as always, thanks for looking!