[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Getting rid of the msvc branch

From: Peter Rosin
Subject: Re: Getting rid of the msvc branch
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 12:06:28 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2

Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-09 08:32:
> Hi Peter, sorry for the delay.

No trouble at all.

> On 03/08/2012 09:24 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Stefano Lattarini skrev 2012-03-07 22:20:


>> Any other branches that might merge maint?  Maybe merge yacc-work into
>> yl-work-for-master and ylwrap-refactor after the above just to make sure
>> they don't merge maint directly at some point in the future?
> The 'yl-work-for-master' was just a temporary branch used to simplify the
> merge of yacc-work into master; it has already been deleted from the automake

Ok, I needed to prune my tree, sorry for mentioning old ghosts of the past.

> official repository.  About the 'ylwrap-refactor' branch, I'm not yet sure
> whether the changes in it are a good idea, so it's OK to keep it inactive for
> now; if we ever resurrect it, we should merge 'master' into it as a first
> step.

/me takes a deep breath.  What was that branch called again?  It keeps
eluding me.  mcsv?  /me ponders some more.  No, that's not it.  Oh well, it's
probably not important anyway.  /me keeps breathing fresh air.  Aaaaa!  Nice!

> Oh, and since I was at it, I've noticed we had never converted the 
> long-inactive
> (12 years!) branches 'user-dep-gen-merge-branch' and 'user-dep-gen-branch' 
> into
> tags.  I've now done that as well.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]