[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automake shooting in its foot
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: Automake shooting in its foot |
Date: |
24 Jan 2001 01:02:37 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
On Jan 23, 2001, address@hidden wrote:
> So, IMHO, we have just no issue until we release an autoconf --trace
> aware automake. And frankly, I can't wait :) Automake will be much
> shorter (less hard coded knowledge on Autoconf), more robust (less
> hard coded knowledge on Autoconf), and more extendible (less hard
> coded knowledge on Autoconf).
:-)
Meanwhile, can't we just hide the uses of AC_PROG_CC and _CXX from
automake by adding ][ in the middle of their names?
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Automake shooting in its foot, akim, 2001/01/23
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot,
Alexandre Oliva <=
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24
- Re: Automake shooting in its foot, Akim Demaille, 2001/01/24