[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: amtraces
From: |
Pavel Roskin |
Subject: |
Re: amtraces |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:29:33 -0500 (EST) |
> Hm, I'm in favor of having AC_ARG_PROGRAM always run. I see no use in
> having only partial support for this option across configures. In
> addition, AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, IIRC, calls it by itself.
>
> Pavel, Alexandre, any problem with integrating AC_ARG_PROGRAM in AC_INIT?
An obvious problem is that if AC_CANONICAL_TARGET is used, it should be
before AC_ARG_PROGRAM and after AC_INIT, so there will be no place for it.
AC_CANONICAL_TARGET should be optional - not every program is a compiler.
Probably a dubious feature about $target being the default program prefix
will have to be dropped. Alternatively, AC_CANONICAL_TARGET should
implement it if the values set by (the former) AC_ARG_PROGRAM are pristine
(i.e. the transform rule is trivial).
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
- Re: amtraces, (continued)
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/08
- Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/03
- Re: amtraces,
Pavel Roskin <=
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04
- Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04
- Re: 31-ac-libsources.patch & Re: amtraces, Derek R. Price, 2001/02/04
- Re: 31-ac-libsources.patch & Re: amtraces, Akim Demaille, 2001/02/05
- Re: 31-ac-libsources.patch & Re: amtraces, Alexandre Oliva, 2001/02/06
Re: amtraces, Tom Tromey, 2001/02/02