[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT)
From: |
Alexandre Oliva |
Subject: |
Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT) |
Date: |
28 Mar 2001 20:10:35 -0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
On Mar 28, 2001, "Robert Collins" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> From: edward [mailto:address@hidden
>> development utilities like libtool *expect* the .exe to *not* be
>> explicitly tagged in the Makefiles. having .exe breaks libtools
>> usage of scripts to wrap applications which need a loader hint
This is a correct assessment. Maybe libtool should give up on
creating wrapper scripts, and start linking replacement executables
with similar effects?
> Isn't there a _SCRIPTS primary _for scripts_. That doesn't get
> $(EXEEXT) added to it at all. Perhaps the wrong target was being
> used?
Nope. automake can't tell in advance whether libtool will decide to
link the executable in-place or create a wrapper script.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer address@hidden, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp address@hidden, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT), (continued)
RE: program target missing $(EXEEXT), Robert Collins, 2001/03/26
RE: program target missing $(EXEEXT), Robert Collins, 2001/03/27
RE: program target missing $(EXEEXT), Robert Collins, 2001/03/27
- Re: program target missing $(EXEEXT),
Alexandre Oliva <=