[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:24:06 -0700 (PDT) |
> Uncompressed sources of ash with function support are smaller than
> that.
:-)
I've found that a few standard Posix tools, plus GNU Make, are a nice
combination (c.f. the `package-framework' via anonymous ftp from
regexps.com -- not that the framework is anywhere near done).
Recent work on GNU make also looks nifty.
-t
- proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Tom Lord, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Pavel Roskin, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bruce Korb, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/13
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Dean Povey, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Glenn McGrath, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bruce Korb, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Andreas Buening, 2002/10/14
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Soren A, 2002/10/15
- Re: proposal to fork the build-tools projects, Bernd Jendrissek, 2002/10/15