[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: weird flags set by configure

From: miki . shapiro
Subject: Re: weird flags set by configure
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:52:35 +0200

Well, I guess we all got smarter on the tripple -I. issue. Thanks!

Otherwise, I'm also subscribed on the list, so no need to CC me in every
post :-)
Miki Shapiro <address@hidden>
Coder - Unixophile - Boarder - Quake God
Aladdin Knowledge Systems
Tel: +972-(4)-8811403  ICQ: 3EE853
C++ Berkeley Burton Tribes
Have board. Will ride.

On 11/07/2002 01:54:55 PM CET Tim Van Holder wrote:
>On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 12:57, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >>> "Tim" == Tim Van Holder <address@hidden> writes:
>>  Tim> On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 11:11, address@hidden wrote:
>>  >> DEFAULT_INCLUDES =  -I. -I$(srcdir) -I.
>>  >>
>>  >> This raises 2 questions in itself:
>>  >> a. what's wrong with "DEFAULT_INCLUDES =  -I. -I$(srcdir)"
>>  Tim> Don't know that,
>> The third -I gives the search path for config.h.
>OK - good to know
>>  Tim> There's no harm in -I . -I . -I . as far as I know.
>> FWIW, spaces between `-I' and `.' are not portable.  For instance
>> in this case OSF's cc will handle `.' as a source file.
>OK OK - guess I should have phrased that as 'There's no harm in
>using three consecutive -I options for the same directory, as far
>as I know'.
>Tim Van Holder <address@hidden>

******************************* IMPORTANT ! **********************************
The content of this email and any attachments are confidential and intended 
for the named recipient(s) only.

If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately.
Do not disclose the content of this message or make copies.

This email was scanned by eSafe Mail for viruses, vandals  and other
malicious content.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]