automake
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?


From: cs
Subject: Better to use LIBADD always and never LDADD?
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 13:53:50 -0700 (MST)

For "convenience libraries" I just successfully
used LDADD.  It looks like LIBADD would also have
worked which uses LIBTOOL.....

I think LDADD is only for stuff you will *link*
with executable and LIBADD is more powerful and used
for other things like making real libraries you really
intend to install on system.

If true, wouldn't it be a good idea to get in habit
of using LIBADD (and Libtool) for everything?

i.e.
Why use 2 commands if 1 does both functions?

Chris






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]