[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??
|
From: |
Thomas E. Dickey |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ?? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 4 May 2003 06:58:30 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sun, 3 May 2003, Paul Eggert wrote:
> Possibly you invoked AC_FUNC_MALLOC either directly or indirectly;
> it defines malloc to rpl_malloc if malloc isn't GNU compatible.
given the obscurity of the defect, this ranks as yet another designed-in
bug rather than a feature.
--
T.E.Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/03
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??,
Thomas E. Dickey <=
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/04
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/05
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Paul Eggert, 2003/05/05
- Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Dr. David Kirkby, 2003/05/05
Re: Why is malloc being defined as rpl_malloc ??, Jim Meyering, 2003/05/05