[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: non-recursive automake advice?

From: tom fogal
Subject: Re: non-recursive automake advice?
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:41:01 -0400

*mutter*, forgot to cc the list again...

------- Forwarded Message

From: tom fogal <address@hidden>
To: Bob Friesenhahn <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: non-recursive automake advice? 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:29:09 CDT."
References: <address@hidden> <address@hidden>  <address@hidden> 
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 19:40:14 -0400
Sender: address@hidden

 <address@hidden>Bob Friesenhahn writes:
>On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>>> "tom" == tom fogal <address@hidden> writes:
>> tom> Basically I'd like each module to build their own libtool convenience
>> tom> library, and then have /src/ link all of those modules'
>> tom> convenience libraries into one that is the union of all of them.
>> Do you really want each separate convenience library, or is that just
>> inertia?  I ask because if you don't want separate ones, the task
>> becomes even simpler.
>This is a very good point.  Convenience libraries are really an 

Nah, not really.  I just recently learned about the 'create a
convenience archive from a set of other convenience archives' feature
and got a little giddy with newfound toys.

Your arguments are convincing, I will switch my setup away from
convenience archives.


- -tom

------- End of Forwarded Message

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]