[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Strictness
From: |
Noah Slater |
Subject: |
Re: Strictness |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:03:27 +0100 |
> Only projects overcome with sloth do not maintain a ChangeLog.
Why do something your self when the computer can do it for you?
That's what we invented these things for, right?
> Version control systems come and go and are often not accessible to
> everyone while the tarball may continue to exist after the authors of
> the program have deceased.
I would hope that developers take care to make sure the repository is
in order and that the new maintainer has access.
> It does not seem wise to encourage sloth
> in open source software.
I would not regard avoiding a manual and completely pointless task sloth.
--
"Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so
far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman
- Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Bob Friesenhahn, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness,
Noah Slater <=
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Carl Fürstenberg, 2007/08/11
- Re: Strictness, Robert Collins, 2007/08/12
- Re: Strictness, Noah Slater, 2007/08/12