[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dist-xz compression level
From: |
Andreas Jellinghaus |
Subject: |
Re: dist-xz compression level |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Apr 2010 20:55:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31-20-generic; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Sonntag 11 April 2010 21:37:13 schrieb Andreas Jellinghaus:
> isn't xz extremely sloooow with -9?
> maybe it wasn't a bug, bit intentionally not used,
> as that huge extra amount of time doesn't result in
> that many bytes saved.
>
> is the compression level configureable somehow?
I did two tests with medium size sources and xz -6 vs. xz -9
is not a big difference in speed or compression size.
so please ignore my comment.
Regards, Andreas
- Re: dist-xz compression level, (continued)
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Andreas Jellinghaus, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Pavel Sanda, 2010/04/11
- Re: dist-xz compression level, Reuben Thomas, 2010/04/12
- Re: dist-xz compression level,
Andreas Jellinghaus <=
Re: dist-xz compression level, Jim Meyering, 2010/04/12
Re: dist-xz compression level, Bob Friesenhahn, 2010/04/12