[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AM_COND_IF for earlier Automake
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AM_COND_IF for earlier Automake |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:56:02 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hello Dave,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 11:18:04AM CET:
> On Saturday 18 December 2010, Dave Hart wrote:
> > I'd like a package I depend on to use AM_COND_IF, but it does not want
> > to demand Automake 1.11 at this point. Does this seem like a
> > reasonable solution?
> BTW, I see that automake 1.11 also traces the macros _AM_COND_IF,
> _AM_COND_ELSE and _AM_COND_ENDIF, which are not present nor traced in
> 1.10, so my suggestion above might still be insufficient in some
> situations (if not all).
Exactly. AC_CONFIG_* instances within AM_COND_IF arguments will be
mistreated.
> My advice is: just require Automake 1.11. That's not unreasonable,
> since that's anyway a requirement for developers, not for users.
Agreed.
Also, your implementation shares the bug fixed in v1.11-152-g6f6e328:
- The AM_COND_IF macro also works if the shell expression for the conditional
is no longer valid for the condition.
Cheers,
Ralf