[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option

From: Miles Bader
Subject: Re: bug#11034: Binutils, GDB, GCC and Automake's 'cygnus' option
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 08:53:15 +0900

Pedro Alves <address@hidden> writes:
>> OK, you've all made clear you have your sensible reasons to have the '.info'
> ...
>> it available only though the new, undocumented option named (literally)
>> "hack!info-in-builddir".  I hope this is acceptable to you.
> ...
>> *undocumented* option '!hack!info-in-builddir' (whose name should
>> made it clear that it is not meant for public consumption).
> So will this be called a hack forever, or will the naming be revisited
> before a release?  IMO, either the feature is sensible, and there doesn't
> seem to be a good reason other users couldn't also use it, and hence it
> should get a non-hackish name and be documented; or it isn't sensible, and
> then it shouldn't exist.  Why the second-class treatment?

I suspect there are better, cleaner, ways to accomplish the underlying
goal, but I suppose the gcc maintainers don't want to spend the time
fiddling around with their build infrastructure for such a minor


Alone, adj. In bad company.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]