[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Static library naming

From: Stefano Lattarini
Subject: Re: Static library naming
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:33:26 +0200

[Dropping Automake-NG list, from the next reply]

On 09/24/2012 10:51 AM, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Yes, because I don't want this to be Automake-NG only. But since
> this scheme is opt-in, the compile script "must" be adjusted to
> handle libhello.a anyway. And with an adjusted compile script, I
> suppose the acceptable level of ugliness elsewhere is lowered, as
> it only fixes the (mostly) cosmetic naming problem.
So, if I understand correctly, you're saying that at this point it's
better and simpler to just adjust the 'compile' script?  Or am I
misunderstanding? (in which case, sorry to be so dense!)


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]