[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: excluding intermediate flex test suite files from distribution?

From: Will Estes
Subject: Re: excluding intermediate flex test suite files from distribution?
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:58:51 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

Yeah, I'll work up a small example because the entire test suite is large and 
there's a lot of stuff that follows the same pattern.

On Thursday, 12 November 2015,  1:55 pm -0500, Nick Bowler <address@hidden> 

> Hello,
> On 2015-11-12, Will Estes <address@hidden> wrote:
> > The flex program includes a test suite to enable testing of the version of
> > flex built in the flex tree. From a distributed tar ball (made with "make
> > dist"), it is possible to build flex without needing to have flex already
> > installed because automake includes the intermediate files in the
> > distribution.
> >
> > However, the test suite should not include the intermediate .c (and c++)
> > files because the point of the test suite is to test the flex binary built
> > in the tree, so that binary should build the intermediate .c (and c++)
> > files.
> >
> > How do I do this? I've been playing with it and have not been able to come
> > up with a solution. At most, I'm able to not include some generated header
> > files, which then really confuses the test suite in the generated tar ball.
> >
> > What other information / examples can I provide to make this clear?
> If you can provide a (short!) example, members of this list
> may be able to suggest specific changes.
> The Automake manual has a chapter on how the distribution is built[1].
> A possible solution (not sure if it will work for you, you may have to
> experiment a bit):
>   - Prevent Automake from distributing any of the testsuite-related
>     flex source files (should be achievable using nodist_).
>   - Manually include only the files you actually want, e.g., by using
> Using a dist-hook may be helpful if EXTRA_DIST is not expressive enough.
> [1]
> Cheers,
>   Nick

Will Estes

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]