[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread
From: |
Denis Chertykov |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread |
Date: |
Sat Jan 13 08:47:04 2001 |
address@hidden (J Wunsch) writes:
> Denis Chertykov <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > You use wrong binutils version.
>
> What's the version that is required? I'm using the most recent
> _release_ one (i hesitate to use beta software unless really
> necessary), which is binutils-2.10.1 (November 2000).
Use the binutils from CVS.
> Since the current snapshot doesn't compile with that version, do you
> know whether gcc-3.0 will also be accompanied by a new (official)
> version of binutils?
Probably no.
But, "binutils peoples" are want to release a new version of binutils.
GCC releases and binutils releases is different events.
> At least not with a _release_ of binutils, that was merely my
> question. I was in hope to find an earlier version of gcc that would
> work with binutils-2.10.1.
May be you newer found it.
> But what about the internal consistency compilation problems i
> mentioned? Have they been fixed meanwhile?
You don't point to any real bug.
>
> I can't download the full > 10 GB of gcc source code each day, just in
> order to check whether it's fixed now.
Use CVS. It's really nice.
> spasibo bolshoye za otviet!
koi8 for Russian.
(In private mails. list members can't read by russian)
Denis.
- [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/08
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/09
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/10
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread,
Denis Chertykov <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, J Wunsch, 2001/01/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] GCC 3.0 thread, Denis Chertykov, 2001/01/17