[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: uisp - was Re: [avr-gcc-list] Thanks
From: |
Dale Seaburg |
Subject: |
Re: uisp - was Re: [avr-gcc-list] Thanks |
Date: |
Sun Jan 14 05:56:04 2001 |
Marek,
Marek Michalkiewicz wrote:
> ...
> Are you sure you got the latest version (uisp-20001216.tar.gz)?
No! I simply, and inadvertently, got what was near the top of the list
(sheepish grin). My most humble apologies.
> ...
> The current version already contains the necessary include files.
I downloaded the latest (20001216), and was pleasantly surprised to find
new features. I read in the README that you encountered (and corrected
- 20000930) the same problem I had with the 0.2b release - parallel port
bit definitions (lp.h file).
I do have a question or two: what is the difference between these two
switches: -dstk200 and -davrisp? I have the cable/dongle from my
STK200, so I assume, and use the -dstk200 option. I'm assuming, because
you differentiate, the Atmel AVR ISP (cable?) must be not the same as
the cable from the STK200. Is this correct?
With regard to the --segment option, is this for selecting which area
(flash, eeprom or fuse) gets uploaded? It appears from the --help that
if one were to use the srec format for the upload file that this would
be auto-selected. Is this assumption correct?
Perhaps, I need to look for a FAQ so I don't bother folks with these
endless questions ;-)
Thanks for the help.
Dale
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Thanks, Mike Jones, 2001/01/12