[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?

From: Tvrtko A. Ursulin
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Not naked but "topless" functions?
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 11:31:51 +0200

On Wednesday 16 October 2002 16:07, Kang Tin LAI wrote:

> As my understanding, you are the fourth one for this question of "naked"
> attribute. Everyone playing avr-gcc with kernel have to face this
> problem.
> If this is a "address" operation in your function, it is also a trouble
> regardless how many local you using.

I don't quite understand this bit?

> If you are using linux, I may send you my patch for "naked" which
> generates a proper stack frame setup. But you need to have your source
> codes of gcc, binutils and compilation system working for recompiling
> the avr-gcc.

Yes plese, I have already compiled eveything myself so that won't be a 

I hope that this patch adds this new behavoiur without removing current naked. 
Because I need "naked" as it is now also.


avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]