[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization
|
From: |
Tvrtko A. Ursulin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 09:39:22 +0200 |
On Thursday 17 October 2002 17:20, E. Weddington wrote:
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#Optimize%20O
> > > ptions
> >
> > Nothing about -09 which I found was used in some Makefiles floating
> > around the net ?
>
> The link is to the official GCC documentation. So if you see -O9,
> it's an invalid switch.
Although I know that, I didn't know that avr stuff is officially included in
GCC. I thought it was a patch. So it is understandable why I thought that
avr-gcc maybe adds some specific optimization options.
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, E. Weddington, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Tvrtko A. Ursulin, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, E. Weddington, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Tvrtko A. Ursulin, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Tvrtko A. Ursulin, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Lorne Gutz, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, E. Weddington, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization,
Tvrtko A. Ursulin <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, E. Weddington, 2002/10/23
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/10/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] More on optimization, Theodore A. Roth, 2002/10/11