avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Experimental WinAVR/avr-gcc update for


From: Sander Pool
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Experimental WinAVR/avr-gcc update for
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:50:06 -0700

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "E. Weddington" <address@hidden>
> (Interestingly, according to the unscientific survey at AVR
> Freaks, more people use GCC than any other AVR compiler.)

Yes but what percentage of shipped AVRs run code that was compiled with gcc
vs. that with IAR? I'm willing to bet that less than 25% of all AVR revenue
comes from chips that run gcc. Once you're paying someone a decent salary to
code your product it isn't a large step to spend a few thousand $ on tools.
Guys like me (and probably quite a few of you) buy only a handful of AVRs
per year. Of course I wouldn't buy any if it weren't for avr-gcc :-)

As sad as it us for us, it makes sense for Atmel to stay close to IAR.

  Sander



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]