[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly
|
From: |
Richard Urwin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly |
|
Date: |
Mon, 16 Feb 2004 07:31:10 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.3 |
On Monday 16 Feb 2004 2:47 am, you wrote:
> I guess I could do that just for grins, but the
> final design won't have that luxury. I'll just
> work around the anomaly.
Do it because it might not be the problem, and then you've eliminated
it.
Besides, if it does make a difference, the chances are that over half
the problem is in the wiring anyway, and that's fixable.
--
Richard Urwin
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Loveny Design, 2004/02/15
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/15
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly,
Richard Urwin <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Mattias Svensson, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, t.white, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Douglas Dotson, 2004/02/20
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] ADC anomaly, Loveny Design, 2004/02/15