[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:20:57 +0100 (MET) |
As "E. Weddington" <address@hidden> wrote:
>Worse: its not even a part of the C language. It has nothing to do
>with GCC, or the AVR.
It seems to be quite common among µC C compilers. Unlike the PORTB.0
notation where I don't see how this would ever fit at all into legal C
syntax, I can imagine that 0b is a perferctly legal vendor extension
for a compiler.
Just curious, I've once made a patch for GCC that implements it. This
was merely intented to be a proof of concept. Does anyone
incidentally know whether this feature might have already been
proposed (and perhaps put down) to the GCC folks? If not, do people
feel I should submit that patch?
In case anyone is interested:
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/gcc-0b.patch
(It's IMHO been made against a 3.3 version of GCC, not yet against a
3.4 one.)
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
_______________________________________________
avr-gcc-list mailing list
address@hidden
http://www.avr1.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-gcc-list
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, (continued)
- AW: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, Peter Hierholzer, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, Kang Tin LAI, 2004/03/03
- [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, cswiger, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Douglas Dotson, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, E. Weddington, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, cswiger, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, E. Weddington, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Douglas Dotson, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Erik Christiansen, 2004/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Yura Galayda, 2004/03/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Yura Galayda, 2004/03/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc binary, Anton Erasmus, 2004/03/03
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, David Gay, 2004/03/03
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, Dave Hylands, 2004/03/03
[avr-gcc-list] Gcc bug??, Brian Cuthie, 2004/03/10