Re: [avr-gcc-list] objdump patch

[Svein E. Seldal]

Erik Christiansen wrote:
> The symbol beneficially replaces the relative reference, both in an
> abstract sense and in practical use, doesn't it? I'd very definitely
> spend my 2 cents on your clutter reduced alternative, and increase the
> separation of the symbol, for readability.
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212     <.do_copy_data_start>
>
> Where no symbol is available, I suppose we end up with
>
> 20c:       02 c0           rjmp    0x212     ; .+4
>
> Right alignment is then not bad at all, is it?

Well... I cant control how the symbol will be printed. I.e. if a symbol 
is non-exisiting, it seems like it will always backtrack until it finds one:

41a:       31 f0           breq    0x428 <main+0x6c>       ; .+12

The function for printing the symbol is a built-in (global) function, 
which I do not want to override.

Since I do not know how the symbol output will look like, I cannot 
control if I'm going to need the "; .+xxx" comment or not. So either its 
on or either its off.


Svein