|
From: | Svein E. Seldal |
Subject: | [avr-gcc-list] [VOTE] objdump patch |
Date: | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 17:55:30 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040830) |
HiIt seems like there are several preferences on how the new objdump with symbols output should look like.
To make a decision more fair (and to do a little experiment), I will now arrange a vote on the syntax of the objdump patch. Here are the choices:
A) The old format (as it is today): 20c: 02 c0 rjmp .+4 ; 0x212 B) New syntax which is easier and faster to read 20c: 02 c0 rjmp 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start> ; .+4 C) Similar to B) only without excessive comment. My vote. 20c: 02 c0 rjmp 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start> D) Similar to the old format. The symbol is located in the comment 20c: 02 c0 rjmp .+4 ; 0x212 <.do_copy_data_start>I will keep the vote open out september. In fear of being accused of cheating, I will only count the votes that have been sent to the avr-gcc list.
I hope I'm not violating any mailing-list rules. If I am, please forgive me for being naive/uninformed and please tell me ASAP.
Regards, Svein
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |