[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] efficiency of assigning bits

From: Daniel O'Connor
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] efficiency of assigning bits
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:24:40 +1030
User-agent: KMail/1.7.92

On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 03:03, Parthasaradhi Nayani wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be a better idea to write code that
> > compiles with avr-gcc?
> >     $ avr-gcc -mmcu=at90s2313 /tmp/nayani.c
> >     /tmp/nayani.c:4:14: invalid suffix "B11101101"
> > on integer constant
> winavr is avr-gcc. The suffix error - you have not
> preceded the 'B' with a zero so naturally the compiler
> complained.
> The correct method is 0Bxxxxxxxx
> Also please the binary suffix is implemented in the
> recent past (gcc). Please check the version you have.

I'd be more inclined to use hexidecimal since it's considerably more widely 
supported though.
(Also converting binary -> hex is fairly easy in your head)

Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

Attachment: pgp2WJFwfD688.pgp
Description: PGP signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]