|
From: | Larry Barello |
Subject: | RE: [avr-gcc-list] Union as parameter |
Date: | Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:14:35 -0700 |
Sorry for the blizzard of email... Using bitfields was almost as optimal as manual shift & mask: Resulting .text for my application: Using frames: 14282 (odd size bitfield forces parameter onto stack..) Using Shift/mask: 14002 Using bitfield: 14008 I'll use bitfields as it is easier to layout new eeprom sizes and the code is easier to follow. THANKS!
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |