Re: [avr-gcc-list] How to (efficeiently !!!) test a bit within amulti-byte integer ?

[Eric Weddington]

Niklas Lövgren wrote:
> That's interesting it makes that much differnce between the minors. So how
> much "better" is gcc 4.x.x? 
> And also why isn't the newer gcc versions included in a winavr release?

1. Previously, there have been bugs in that tree affecting the AVR port 
which has made it a "no-go".

2. Because I haven't done a new WinAVR release yet. I'm planning to 
include 4.0.2 as soon as I can come up for air.

Eric