[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with ba

From: Colin O'Flynn
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:31:57 -0400
User-agent: KMail/1.8.2


> I get mad when I run in a 
> problem because someone thought that 'it would be better that way' but I 
> was not made aware of the change. 

Which is why I liked the idea of having the compiler detect if you are using a 
constant of 2/8/10/16 and switching in the fast code, otherwise it's the full 
sized code. Though I only sent it to avr-gcc, and not avr-libc-dev.

>The hell is paved good intentions

"The road to hell is paved with good intentions", we aren't so different ;-)



PS: From now on should we just discuss this an avr-libc-dev, it seems more in 
place at this point?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]