[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with ba

From: Joerg Wunsch
Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Re: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:55:59 +0100 (MET)

"Colin O'Flynn" <address@hidden> wrote:

> "The road to hell is paved with good intentions", we aren't so
> different ;-)

Neither are the Germans: ,,Der Weg zur Hölle ist mit guten Vorsätzen

I guess I agree with Bernard's argumentation, basically.

> PS: From now on should we just discuss this an avr-libc-dev, it
> seems more in place at this point?

I agree.  I'd like to ``officially'' finish the poll here, and thank
everyone who participated.  I know people are interested in getter
faster and smaller code, but also think violating POLA is not to be
taken lightly.  I'll see what will eventually come out, but it should
be at least a compile-time option to select the faster (and smaller)

cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]