[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument

From: Ron Kreymborg
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 13:13:28 +1100

> Can the "error" have  overide?
> Might that be useful to permit code generation for a new variant
> before GCC has caught up with full definitions?
> Andy

The ones for the ISR macros were originally warnings, but their occurrence
invariably meant the jump table was not linked to the interrupt function.
Ditto with the proposed ISRN macros. But yes, I see your point, and warnings
would allow the compile to proceed. Perhaps the doco could explain what are
the consequences when the warning appears and then it is "user beware".


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]