Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Patch Fix PR35013, PR27192

[Dmitry K.]

On Wednesday 16 April 2008 14:02, Andy H wrote:
> RFC
>
> A problem has come up trying to  fix  function pointer arthmetic bugs.
[...]

(It is difficult to understand all quickly.)
A question:  Is it safety to use common indirect call
of function with avr6 at present moment?  It is interesting,
as indirect call is used in Avr-libc's EEPROM functions now.

I have try a small program.  Seems, the result is wrong
(Binutils is 2.18, see avr-libc-dev discussion).

Thanks,
Dmitry.