[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Patch Fix PR35013, PR27192

From: Dmitry K.
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: Patch Fix PR35013, PR27192
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:13:20 +1100
User-agent: KMail/1.5

On Wednesday 16 April 2008 14:02, Andy H wrote:
> A problem has come up trying to  fix  function pointer arthmetic bugs.

(It is difficult to understand all quickly.)
A question:  Is it safety to use common indirect call
of function with avr6 at present moment?  It is interesting,
as indirect call is used in Avr-libc's EEPROM functions now.

I have try a small program.  Seems, the result is wrong
(Binutils is 2.18, see avr-libc-dev discussion).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]