RE: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:20 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between 
> WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?
> 
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 02:36:29 pm Bob Paddock wrote:
> 
> > > Anatoly Sokolov suggested, in another thread or two on 
> the avr-gcc list,
> > > using the gcc option "--param inline-call-cost=N"
> > > Where N is between 1 and 7
> > >
> > > I found that for the one project that I have going now 
> where size really
> > > matters, that N=3 is giving me the smallest binary.  Oddly with
> > > WinAVR-20080430 N=2 gave the smallest binary.
> >
> > Alas the boss has "Ship by X" on the schedule, not "put 
> randomg settings
> > in to the tools to see what happens". 
> 
> Anyone tried this?:
> http://www.coyotegulch.com/products/acovea/
> 

I haven't tried it, though I've been aware of acovea for some years now.