[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 2
RE: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:18:59 -0600
> -----Original Message-----
> org] On Behalf Of Bob Paddock
> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:20 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between
> WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?
> On Tuesday 13 May 2008 02:36:29 pm Bob Paddock wrote:
> > > Anatoly Sokolov suggested, in another thread or two on
> the avr-gcc list,
> > > using the gcc option "--param inline-call-cost=N"
> > > Where N is between 1 and 7
> > >
> > > I found that for the one project that I have going now
> where size really
> > > matters, that N=3 is giving me the smallest binary. Oddly with
> > > WinAVR-20080430 N=2 gave the smallest binary.
> > Alas the boss has "Ship by X" on the schedule, not "put
> randomg settings
> > in to the tools to see what happens".
> Anyone tried this?:
I haven't tried it, though I've been aware of acovea for some years now.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] What has changed between WinAVR20070525rc2andWinAVR 20080430?,
Weddington, Eric <=