[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: "progmem_far" attribute

From: Andy H
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: "progmem_far" attribute
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 13:32:29 -0400
User-agent: Thunderbird (Windows/20080421)

I was describing concept - not literally.

Literal it would be

|*int* (far *x)(*float*, *char*, *char*) = NULL;  |

or similar.

Internally we would handle as unsigned long (SImode).
If we get that far without a road block, then the last step is for gcc to permit a call using this and not squark that it is not a pointer.


Bob Paddock wrote:
On 7/20/08, Andy H <address@hidden> wrote:

 If we can create "FAR" as unsigned long

Should that not be size_t rather than unsigned long?

Might not make a difference on the smaller AVR's right
now but if we ever need to port the code to a future AVR64
it might.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]