[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avr-gcc-list] Most reliable version of avr-gcc?

From: David Carr
Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Most reliable version of avr-gcc?
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 17:37:59 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20081125)

By reliability, I mean least probability of undetected errors in machine code generation. IE: The machine code conforms to the source code.


Weddington, Eric wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
org] On Behalf Of David Carr
Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2008 2:34 PM
To: address@hidden
Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Most reliable version of avr-gcc?

If one were to compile a program for the AVR where reliability was far
more important than code size or performance optimizations, what version
of avr-gcc would you choose?

What do you mean by 'reliability'?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]