[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] odd optimization differences of shift between C andC+
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] odd optimization differences of shift between C andC++ |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Nov 2010 05:25:28 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of William "Chops" Westfield
> Sent: Sunday, November 07, 2010 9:58 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] odd optimization differences of shift
> between C andC++
>
>
>
> Is this expected? Is it bug-worthy ?
>
I would say that it's bug-worthy, as a missed optimization bug. FYI, there are
more bugs with the C++ compiler for the AVR than for the C compiler. So I'm not
totally surprised that this is happening.
BTW, could you please subscribe to the mailing list? That way your posts do not
have to be approved by hand.