Re: [avr-gcc-list] Weird optimization issue with avr-gcc 4.5.3, re "naked."

[Georg-Johann Lay]

Weddington, Eric wrote:
> The main function should still be set up as a "OS_main" function, i.e.
> it doesn't return anywhere.

>From how I understand OS_main and from the sources, there is nothing that adds
noreturn semantics to OS_main. It's the same as OS_task except that OS_main
assumes that IRQs are off. In particular, OS_main functions will have an 
epilogue.

Johann