Re: [avr-libc-dev] Is there interest in an arm-libc?

[Markus Hitter]

Hello Bob,

thanks for this explanation. The reason I'm asking such questions is, I want to 
find out wether there are cases where SystemInit() is unavoidable. I take your 
answer as a "no", because constructors usually go, well, into the constructor 
of a class. I have to admit I use C++ very rarely, though, prefering either 
plain C or Objective-C.


Am 10.11.2014 um 20:52 schrieb Bob Paddock:
> Here is atomic.h ported to ARM which you'll need:
> 
> https://github.com/PaulStoffregen/cores/blob/master/teensy3/util/atomic.h

Funny coincident is, one co-developer of mine used Paul Stoffregens library 
(for Arduino) to port to Teensy3.1 (the port works) and this is exactly the 
reason why I'm coming up with a plan for an arm-libc. Because everything is 
custom, custom ... and you have to port over and over again for each new chip. 
Teensy 3.1 port (from Teensy3) was already the third port to ARM and it took 
almost as long as long as from Teensy2 (AVR) to Teensy3 (ARM).

>  There are other things there that may help  you as well.

I try to put no emphasis on what helps exactly me in exactly this case. IMO, 
code which helps everybody, everywhere matters.

Sorry for such unpleasant words as an answer to your help attempt. It's the 
fourth time now people seem to assume I'm incapable to solve my particular task 
currently at hand, which bugs me a bit. If it were just about a single port of 
a single application for one user I hadn't even subscribed to this list and 
would already be done. Perhaps I'm a bit behind fashion when trying to solve 
tasks not only for me. :-}


Cheers :-)

Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/