[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR
From: |
Galen Seitz |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:05:28 -0700 |
Brian Dean <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> OK, well, feeling a little dangerous, I just set the SCK period down
> to 1.1 us - the fastest allowed, and that dropped the read time down
> to 27 seconds - much more appetizing. Is it safe to do this? I did
> do a program and verify and it checked out OK.
>
As long as the internal clock frequency of the target AVR is greater or
equal to four times the SCK frequency, I think you should be okay. I
ran into SCK frequency problems on my initial programming attempts with
the mega48. The internal oscillator of the mega48 runs at 8 MHz, but the
clk divide by 8 fuse defaults to on. Thus I have to set the SCK period
to >= 4 us for unprogrammed parts.
galen
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, (continued)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, E. Weddington, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Brian Dean, 2005/08/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Bernard Fouché, 2005/08/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Brian Dean, 2005/08/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Brian Dean, 2005/08/28
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Bernard Fouché, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Brian Dean, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR,
Galen Seitz <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/30
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Brian Dean, 2005/08/29
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/30
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Bernard Fouché, 2005/08/30
- Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Bernard Fouché, 2005/08/29
Re: [avrdude-dev] Re: WinAVR, Joerg Wunsch, 2005/08/28