axiom-developer
[Top][All Lists]

## [Axiom-developer] Axiom's latex output

 From: root Subject: [Axiom-developer] Axiom's latex output Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:11:57 -0500

Joris,

Chris has raised issues similar to ones you raised in the past.
Is there a common set of "standard latex" primitives you both use?
If so, we can create another latex output format such as
)set output texmacs
that could satify both needs.

Tim

> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:09:43 +0000 (GMT)
> Subject: Re: [Axiom-mail] TeX vs LaTeX output on AXIOM
>
> Many thanks Tim for your swift response.
>
> I'd certainly like to know more about Joris' "standard latex".  I've not
> picked up this thread.  I expect a flexible solution would satisfy us
> both.  Where is the TeX function defined in the Source.  This is my first
> adventure into the AXIOM source, and I have no idea where to begin.
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
>
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, root wrote:
>
> > Chris,
> >
> > Sorry for the delay. I had to prepare for a class.
> >
> > As I understand it you would rather have \frac rather than \over
> > as output for fractions, for example. Since we have the source
> > clearly this can be changed. Unfortunately the change is not likely
> > to be simple because the forms are in different order. You would
> > like
> >
> > {a} \over {b}   => \frace{a}{b}
> >
> > I'll look to see where the latex for \over is created.
> > Is it possible to define \over in a .sty file on your side?
> >
> > Joris has a similar complaint. I'm unsure if his "standard latex"
> > is the same as your "standard latex"
> >
> >
> > An alternative path, which I've also mentioned to Joris, is to
> > keep the current output unchanged and implement another output
> > (HTML-tool, Texmacs) for the different front ends.
> >
> > Tim Daly
> >
> >
>
>
> > Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:20:38 +0100 (CET)
> > From: Joris van der Hoeven <address@hidden>
> > To: David MENTRE <address@hidden>