[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: 404 http://axiom.tenkan.org/axiom.20040321.tgz
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: 404 http://axiom.tenkan.org/axiom.20040321.tgz]
22 Apr 2004 14:40:55 -0400
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Along these lines, I'd just like to note that the 01/30 axiom snapshot
has just entered Debian testing. Had to hand compile on alpha to get
around a libc6.1 bug which apparently will not be fixed soon.
As earlier stated, I'd like to get another snapshot in before the
Debian 'sarge' release is finalized. Toward this end, I think the
axiom package needs splitting, at the very least due to the Debian
policy requirements that arch-dependent (e.g. .o files) and
arch-independent (e.g. source files and docs) data needs to be
As I know there are quite a few Debian axiom users here, I thought I'd
solicit opinions on a binary package structure. Perhaps at least
axiom, axiom-doc and axiom-source.
David MENTRE <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello Camm,
> Camm Maguire <address@hidden> writes:
> > 6) I'd like to include the output of dvipdfm on the book.dvi. I'm
> > also wondering if the documentation can be readily converted into
> > info and/or html format by existing tools.
> noweb is capable of producing html output, using -html switch. However,
> I don't know how to handle graphics. Probably more simple to convert the
> raw .tex file into html using Hevea or latex2html.
> David MENTRE <address@hidden> -- http://www.nongnu.org/axiom/
> Axiom-developer mailing list
Camm Maguire address@hidden
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah