[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: 404

From: Camm Maguire
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: 404]
Date: 22 Apr 2004 14:40:55 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2


Along these lines, I'd just like to note that the 01/30 axiom snapshot
has just entered Debian testing.  Had to hand compile on alpha to get
around a libc6.1 bug which apparently will not be fixed soon.

As earlier stated, I'd like to get another snapshot in before the
Debian 'sarge' release is finalized.  Toward this end, I think the
axiom package needs splitting, at the very least due to the Debian
policy requirements that arch-dependent (e.g. .o files) and
arch-independent (e.g. source files and docs) data needs to be

As I know there are quite a few Debian axiom users here, I thought I'd
solicit opinions on a binary package structure.  Perhaps at least
axiom, axiom-doc and  axiom-source.

Take care,

David MENTRE <address@hidden> writes:

> Hello Camm,
> Camm Maguire <address@hidden> writes:
> > 6) I'd like to include the output of dvipdfm on the book.dvi.  I'm
> >    also wondering if the documentation can be readily converted into
> >    info and/or html format by existing tools.
> noweb is capable of producing html output, using -html switch. However,
> I don't know how to handle graphics. Probably more simple to convert the
> raw .tex file into html using Hevea or latex2html.
> Yours,
> d.
> -- 
> David MENTRE <address@hidden> --
> _______________________________________________
> Axiom-developer mailing list
> address@hidden

Camm Maguire                                            address@hidden
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens."  --  Baha'u'llah

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]